Brief introduction to my approach

Here are the key aspects of how I approach metaphysics:

1.

I believe the best way to advance metaphysics is not to tackle isolated questions but to build overarching systems that address many issues at once. In physics, two powerful theories—General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics—revolutionized our understanding by solving numerous problems, posing new ones, and uncovering surprising phenomena. These big-picture systems give us broader comparisons: we can evaluate how many questions each answers, the quality of those answers, what’s left unexplained, and the assumptions involved.

2.

If we focus on systems rather than ad-hoc answers, a dependable tool for comparing different metaphysical frameworks is essential. Without it, any claim could be as valid as any other. My method hinges on what I call the “efficiency rule.” A good system demands minimal inputs—definitions and assumptions—while producing maximal outputs—clear and powerful solutions. Think of it like business: minimal capital, maximal returns.

\(\text{Efficiency} = \frac{\text{Output}}{\text{Input}}\)

With this ratio, we can rank systems: whichever yields the most for the least stands out.

3.

I hold that the Universe is an effect of some deeper reality, and we can glean insights into that metareality from what we observe here. It’s an assumption I can’t prove—maybe the deeper reality is so bizarre we can’t make even the simplest claim about it. But if so, metaphysics becomes futile. That’s why this assumption is necessary: it’s our best shot at understanding the underlying cause.

In pursuing this, I don’t limit myself to philosophy alone. I draw on literature, engineering, everyday experience, and sciences like physics, cosmology, neuropsychology, and biology. As a result, my work features metaphors and models from economics, business, science, sports, and beyond.